vs
Zapier vs Make — AIwire Comparison 2026
6 min read·Updated 2026-04-27
TL;DR
Zapier is the undisputed leader in breadth of integrations and is the safest bet for connecting mainstream business apps. Make (formerly Integromat) offers a more sophisticated visual builder and better value for power users who build complex, multi-step automations. Choose Zapier when you need maximum app coverage; choose Make when you need finer control over logic and data transformation.
Zapier vs Make — Feature Comparison
| Feature | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation Platforms | Automation Platforms |
| Pricing | Free tier / Pro from $19.99/mo | Free tier / Pro from $9/mo |
| Tags | automation, no-code, integrations, ai-agents | automation, no-code, visual, integrations |
| AIwire Score | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
AIwire Scores
Zapier
8.0/10Make
8.0/10Zapier
Strengths
- ✓Unmatched integration count: 9,000+ app connections cover virtually every mainstream and niche SaaS tool your business uses.
- ✓Zapier Agents: AI-powered autonomous agents that execute workflows and respond to natural-language triggers (available as a separate add-on).
- ✓Enterprise trust: Used by over 2 million businesses; proven reliability, security, and compliance features that large organizations demand.
Weaknesses
- ✗Higher cost: Pro plan starts at $73.50/month (billed annually), and advanced features quickly push you into higher tiers.
- ✗Simpler logic model: While easy to use, Zapier's "trigger-action" paradigm can feel limiting for workflows that need complex branching or data manipulation.
Make
Strengths
- ✓Advanced visual builder: Drag-and-drop scenario editor with branching, loops, and data-transformation nodes that give you fine-grained control over logic.
- ✓Cost-effective pricing: Core plan starts at €9/month and includes higher operation limits for the price — significantly cheaper than Zapier's entry-level tiers.
- ✓OpenAI integration modules: Connect to OpenAI models directly within scenarios, enabling AI-powered steps inside your automations.
Weaknesses
- ✗Smaller integration library: ~1,500 apps (still substantial) vs. Zapier's 7,000+, so niche or newer tools may be missing.
- ✗Brand recognition: Less known than Zapier, which can be a factor in team adoption and third-party support.
Which Tool Should You Pick?
Pick Zapier if…
- You need to connect to a niche or brand-new SaaS tool that's less likely to be supported elsewhere.
- Your team values name-recognition, third-party tutorials, and a huge community for support.
- You prefer a straightforward "trigger-action" model and don't require complex programming-like logic in your automations.
Pick Make if…
- You're an automation power user who needs loops, conditional branching, and advanced data transformation in a visual interface.
- Your stack fits within its 1,500+ integrations and you want better pricing for high-volume workflows.
- You want to experiment with AI-agent nodes inside your automations without stitching together separate services.
Related Comparisons
Ready to Decide?
Try both tools and see which fits your workflow.
External links. AIwire may earn a commission if you sign up.